Observatoire du communautarisme | Informations sur la laïcité, les discriminations et le racisme

Observatoire indépendant d'information et de réflexion sur le communautarisme, la laïcité, les discriminations et le racisme


Abonnement à la lettre d'information
 




Recherche
Site Google






Home  >  Réflexion  >  Tribunes


AccueilAccueil    Envoyer à un amiEnvoyer à un ami    Version imprimableVersion imprimable    Augmenter la taille du texteAugmenter la taille du texte    Diminuer la taille du texteDiminuer la taille du texte

Tribunes

Party in Search of a Notion

par Michael Tomasky, The American Prospect, Volume 17, Issue 5

In terms of political philosophy, this idea of citizens sacrificing for and participating in the creation of a common good has a name: civic republicanism. It's the idea, which comes to us from sources such as Rousseau's social contract and some of James Madison's contributions to the Federalist Papers, that for a republic to thrive, leaders must create and nourish a civic sphere in which citizens are encouraged to think broadly about what will sustain that republic and to work together to achieve common goals.



The American Prospect, Volume 17, Issue 5
The American Prospect, Volume 17, Issue 5
The Democrats are feeling upbeat these days, and why not? The Republican president and vice president have lost the country's confidence. The Republican-controlled Congress is a sump of corruption, sycophancy, and broken principle. Races in the midterm election that Democratic leaders wouldn't have dreamed of a few months ago are in play (the Senate seat in Tennessee!). A recent poll showed Democrats with a gaping 16-point lead over Republicans this fall. Seizing on the issues of corruption and incompetence, the party might even take back the House or the Senate -- or both.

The prevailing conventional wisdom in Washington -- that the Democrats have no idea what they stand for -- has recently been put to the test in persuasive ways. In an important piece in the May issue of The Washington Monthly, Amy Sullivan demonstrates that the Democrats have in fact become a disciplined and effective opposition party. From their Social Security victory to George W. Bush's backing down on his post-Katrina changes to the Davis-Bacon law to the Dubai ports deal, the Democrats have dealt the administration a series of defeats -- each of which took a reflexive media, still accustomed to hitting F9 to spit out the words “Democrats in disarray,” by complete surprise. More than that, the Democrats do have ideas; it's just that no one bothers to cover them.

The party has discipline, a tactical strategy as the opposition, and a more than respectable roster of policy proposals waiting to be considered should Democrats become the majority again. It's quite different from, say, three years ago. But let's not get carried away. There remains a missing ingredient -- the crucial ingredient of politics, the factor that helps unite a party (always a coalition of warring interests), create majorities, and force the sort of paradigm shifts that happened in 1932 and 1980. It's the factor they need to think about if their goal is not merely to win elections but to govern decisively after winning them.

Lire la suite sur le site de la revue The American Prospect

Mardi 06 Juin 2006
Lu 3762 fois

Articles | Ouvrages | Entretiens | Références | Tribunes